The following short progress report, written by a student in geology, provides an excellent example of how concrete and affirmative a progress report can be. Note the specificity even in the title, and how sections such as "Remaining Questions" and "Expected Results" demonstrate that the writer, even though he is two months away from the completion of his thesis, is thinking about the work in a professional manner.
Click here to open a sample progress report within this page.
"Stratigraphic Architecture of Deep-Ramp Carbonates: Implications for Deposition
of Volcanic Ashes, Salona and Coburn Formations, Central Pennsylvania"
by John Lerner
SCOPE AND PURPOSE
The Late Middle Ordovician-age Salona and Coburn formations of central Pennsylvania show cyclic patterns on a scale of tens of meters. Little research has been done on sequence stratigraphy of deep-water mixed carbonate/siliciclastic systems, and a depositional model for this environment is necessary to understand the timing and processes of deposition. The stratigraphic position of the bentonites at the base of the larger cycles is significant because it indicates that they accumulated during a time of non-deposition in a deep water environment.
To date, I have described five lithofacies present in the Salona and Coburn formations. Two lithofacies are interpreted as storm deposits and make up the limestone component of the thinly-bedded couplets. Some trends were observed in the raw data; however, because of the "noisy" nature of the data, a plot of the five-point moving average of bed thickness was created to define the cycles better.
Two key tasks are to be completed in the coming weeks. With the results of these tests and the field observations, I will create a model for deposition of a deep-ramp mixed carbonate/siliciclastic system in a foreland basin environment. The model will include depositional processes, stratigraphic architecture, and tectonic setting.
Questions remain regarding the depositional processes responsible for the featureless micrite at the base of the Salona Formation. . . . How rapid was the transition? What record (if any?) remains of the transition? Were bentonites not deposited, or were they selectively removed at certain locations by erosive storm processes?
I expect to find that the large-scale cycles represent parasequences. Flooding surfaces are marked by bentonites and shales, with bentonites removed in some locations. If the cycles are true parasequences, the implication is that eustatic sea level changes and not tectonic influences controlled the depositional changes over the interval.
This report structure is often used when you have to research theory and apply it to a practical or real situation. It is a variation of the traditional formal report format. It may contain all or some of the following sections and headings (and necessary and relevant subheadings) depending on the length of the assignment and of course the instructions given in your assignment task. An evaluative report might be structured like this:
Letter of transmittal (generally ONLY requested in Business and Tourism)
Abstract (also often called Executive Summary or Summary)
Table of Contents
Body (generally not used as a heading)
The body of this type of report is often structured with headings and subheadings relevant to:
provide a factual description of the workplace/situation (‘to set the scene’ for the subsequent findings (analysis and/or evaluation) conclusions and recommendations).
present the theory, results or findings and interpretations (evaluation/s) of these observations. There are several options for presenting the body section (see below)
Recommendations (if relevant)
Appendix/Appendices (may include photographs, illustrations, etc.)
Quick Guide:Writing reports